|
January 25, 2012 Affordable Gold ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate One of the more enjoyable aspects of a major wine competition, for me at least, is the discovery of affordable wines that were impressive in the challenging environment of a professional wine judging. Whether I am a judge, as I often am, or an official, as I was at the third annual Winemaker Challenge, where I am the director, I am keen to know which of the wines priced at $20 or less stood out. Although I occasionally splurge on an expensive bottle of wine, my everyday wines must fit within my budget.
The cutoff for me is about $20. So with that in mind, I went through the results of Winemaker Challenge III, staged in early January, and compiled a list of the 20 wines for $20 or less that I would buy. I restricted my selections to wines that earned gold medal or better. What's better than gold? Wines sent forward to be tasted in the championship round and voted upon for Best of Show and Wine or the Year are awarded platinum medals. And the top vote-getters in each category are given best-of-class awards. While many on the list, such as the Eberle Vineyard Selection Cabernet Sauvignon, are old favorites, there were a few pleasant surprises. Here, then, are my 20 selections for $20 or less. Estancia 2010 Pinot Grigio, California ($11.99) — Estancia has had a roller-coaster ride down through the years, but recently quality has been surging and the pinot grigio is consistently one of its best wines. This is a grape variety that typically does much better in northern Italy, but Estancia's version is one that can stand up to the Italians. It was voted Best Pinot Grigio at Winemaker Challenge. Milbrandt 2010 Riesling, Traditions, Columbia Valley ($12.99) — Suffice it to say Washington is the hot spot for riesling production in the U.S. Milbrandt has been scoring with this wine big-time in recent years, but winning Best of Show white wine at Winemaker Challenge easily tops the list of recent accolades. The Milbrandt 2010 Pinot Gris scored another huge hit for the winery by winning the Winemaker Challenge vote for Best Pinot Gris. Peter Lehmann 2009 Clancy's Shiraz-Cabernet-Merlot, Australia ($17) — This well-balanced red from Australia earned honors as the top Bordeaux-Rhone blend, prevailing narrowly over the Eberle Winery Cabernet Sauvignon-Syrah blend. The combination of quality and price will make this wine a serious contender this year for best "value" red.
Blackstone 2009 Pinot Noir, Reserve, Sonoma County ($19.99) — My favorite domestic pinot noir last year was a $75 wine from Sonoma County, so when I find an impressive Sonoma pinot in this price range I tend to stand up and take notice. Blackstone also happens to be one of the better "value" brands in the market, so the quality for the money is hardly a surprise. Cameron Hughes 2007 Cabernet Sauvignon Lot 287, Napa Valley ($20) — Cameron Hughes (a real person) purchases expendable "wine lots" from outstanding producers in the finest appellations and bottles them under his own label at a price that is much lower than it would be if the wines were bottled and released by the producer. These are lots of very fine wine that for one reason or another didn't find their way into the producer's final blend. Cameron Hughes doesn't reveal the names of the wineries that sell him the wines, but you can bet the average price for a Napa Valley Cab is north of $50. Chateau Ste. Michelle 2010 Dry Riesling, Columbia Valley ($9) — This beautiful wine (from a different vintage) was named Wine of the Year at the Critics Challenge a couple of years back. This riesling is produced in volume, so it's a triumph for Chateau Ste. Michelle that the quality is so high and the wine so consistent year after year. Clos du Bois 2010 Pinot Noir, North Coast ($14) — Bargain hunters should be aware that the price says little about this gold-medal pinot. Clos du Bois produces large quantities of very good wine, and the volume is what keeps the price low. As we head into the spring and summer months, and wine enthusiasts are looking for lighter reds to serve at barbecues and picnics, the Clos du Bois merlot should be on everyone's shopping list. Concannon Vineyard 2010 Sauvignon Blanc, Reserve, Monterey County ($20) — I must confess, I love this winery that's located in the so un-chic Livermore Valley. It may not be a fancy address, but Concannon has great history on its side and beautiful vineyard sources throughout California's Central Coast. This is a lovely Monterey County Sauvignon that could easily be my house white, and often is.
Domaine Ste. Michelle Brut Rose, Columbia Valley ($13) — The bubblies from Chateau Ste. Michelle were once upon a time fairly simple and uninspiring. That's no longer the case. This brut rose would make a fine aperitif on Valentine's Day. Or any other day, for that matter! Eberle Winery 2009 Cabernet Sauvignon, Vineyard Selection, Paso Robles ($19) — Year after year, I see this Eberle cab win gold at various wine competitions and I wonder how much longer the winery will hold the line on the price. So far, so good. It's probably among the top 10 cabs in California at less than $20 a bottle. Franciscan Estate 2010 Chardonnay, Estate, Napa Valley ($17.99) — This is one of those "you've got to be kidding me" wines. An estate-grown Napa Valley chardonnay from a terrific producer wins a gold medal, and it's only $18? You've got to be kidding me. Mouton Cadet Rouge 2009 Bordeaux, France ($10) — In the world of $10 Bordeaux (true, that's a very small world), this has to be one of the best. And that's not damning it with faint praise. This one's very delicious. Navarro 2010 Chardonnay, Mendocino ($17) — Navarro is a great story because it's a family winery that's still owned and run by the family. The wines are outstanding and always have been. So if the menu calls for chardonnay and you want to impress without spending too much, this Navarro chard will not disappoint. Pietra Santa 2009 Pinot Noir, Estate, Cienega Valley ($18) — This small, obscure appellation in San Benito County, Calif., truly produces outstanding wines (Calera is the star of the region), and Pietra Santa is one of the major players. This estate pinot may not be in the same league with a Calera at three times the price, but you'll have to look under every rock in California before you will find a better pinot at this price.
Rapaura Springs 2011 Sauvignon Blanc, Single Vineyard, Marlborough, New Zealand ($11.99) — I had never heard of this winery until the 2012 Winemaker Challenge. They only won the vote for Best Pinot Noir and a gold for this sauvignon. At this price, I would buy it by the case, and then I would buy some more! Re Del Castello 2007 Chianti Classico DOCG, Italy ($9.99) — A gold-medal Chianti Classico DOCG for $10? You've got to be kidding me. Well, actually, it's true, and the wine is very, very tasty. Rodney Strong 2009 Cabernet Sauvignon, Sonoma County ($17) — Rodney Strong never gets enough credit for its cabernet. That's probably because the chardonnays have been so good for so long. But RS does cabernet, and very well at that. Sherwood House Vineyards 2010 Chardonnay, Oregon Road Estate, North Fork of Long Island ($18) — This wine is a mouthful, whether you're sipping it or saying it. The North Fork of Long Island is best known for its cabernet franc and merlot, but Sherwood House has a long tradition of fine, beautifully balanced chardonnay. South Coast Winery 2008 GSM, Temecula Valley ($14) — Southern California was well represented when this grenache-syrah-Mourvedre blend from Riverside County's Temecula Valley won the vote at Winemaker Challenge for Best Rhone Blend. It's yummy stuff from an area that is underappreciated for the quality of the wines it makes from the Mediterranean grape varieties.
Vilarnau 2008 Cava, Brut Nature Reserva, Spain ($17.99) — This is without a doubt my finest discovery in Spanish cava in the past five years. It's a complex, lovely sparkling wine that may well alter any negative thoughts you might have about cava. Wakefield 2011 Riesling, Clare Valley, Australia ($16.99) — The Clare Valley is probably the new world's sweet spot for riesling. The structure and flavor profile likely won't bring to mind a European riesling, but the quality is there, and the Wakefield Clare has been one of my favorite dry rieslings for a number of years. |
|
January 4, 2012 Castello Banfi's Tour de Force ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate Wine of the year is one thing; winery of the year is another. To choose the former, I simply go with my gut. The "wow" factor is of utmost importance, and the winner should certainly exhibit profound characteristics that can be easily identified, even by a novice. The latter is recognition for a body of work. While some of it certainly should contain an element of profundity, the most important factor is consistent excellence over an extended period of time and with multiple wines. I also factor cost into the equation, which I do not for Wine of the Year, which is simply the wine that most impressed me regardless of price.
Price most definitely played a critical role in this year's selection of Winery of the Year, for the "value" factor delivered by the Tuscan wines of Castello Banfi was nothing short of astounding throughout 2011. The measure of consistency can be found in the performance of these wines over a six-month stretch at three major international wine competitions under my supervision — the San Diego International, Critics Challenge and Sommelier Challenge. At the San Diego International, Banfi walked off with 10 medals, then seven at Critics Challenge and eight at Sommelier Challenge. Other wineries may have won more medals, but Banfi did so with wines that ranged in price from moderately expensive to dirt cheap. I would bore you with the details, except that the details are anything but boring for those who fancy fine wine at bargain bin prices. At the 28th annual San Diego International Wine Competition (SDIWC) in April, Banfi's 2008 Chianti Classico DOCG ($13) won a Platinum award, meaning it advanced to the championship round of voting for Best of Show red wine, where it fell short but in the meantime was named Best Chianti. Castello Banfi's 2006 Brunello di Montalcino (its flagship wine) won a Gold award, and eight other wines took Silver, including the 2008 Centine Rosso and 2009 Centine Bianco at $11 each. These are some of the tastiest wines in the world at this price!
At the eighth annual Critics Challenge (all of the judges were well-known wine journalists) in May, the 2007 Banfi Chianti Classico Riserva DOCG ($18) took a Platinum award; the 2009 Centine Rose ($11), the 2010 Rosa Regale Brachetto d'Acqui DOCG ($23) and the 2009 Rosso di Montalcino DOC ($19) nabbed Gold awards all. Three other Banfi wines received Silver awards. And finally, at the third annual Sommelier Challenge (all of the judges were certified sommeliers), Banfi and Castello Banfi claimed six Gold awards and two Silvers, one of the Golds being the brilliant Super Tuscan "Belnero" from the 2007 vintage at $39. For Castello Banfi, 2011 represented a tour de force by its outstanding portfolio, from its flagship wines such as the 2006 Brunello and 2007 Belnero to its modestly priced introductory "Centine" wines. That said, the competition was daunting. Eberle Winery of Paso Robles, Calif., was impressive throughout the year, particularly at the Sommelier Challenge, where it won 13 awards from 14 wines entered and was named Winery of the Year for the competition. It also won 10 awards at the Winemaker Challenge in January, nine at the SDIWC and seven at the Critics Challenge. Eberle specializes in Paso cabernet, syrah and zinfandel.
California's Bonny Doon Vineyards also had a very good year. Even though Bonny Doon does not enter wine competitions, I follow the wines closely because they are made by the brilliant winemaker Randall Grahm, who's also been known to deliver a measure of profundity at a reasonable price. The greatest example of that in the past year was the delicious 2010 Clos de Gilroy Grenache at $18. His finest wine released in the past year, however, was the flagship Le Cigare Volant ($35) from the 2007 vintage. Bonny Doon also unleashed a number of vineyard-designated syrahs that exhibit exceptional structure and minerality without any apparent lack of impactful fruit. These wines are difficult to find, though. I would be remiss if I didn't mention several producers from other parts of the United States that had exceptional years, but suffer from lack of exposure and distribution. Frogtown Cellars of Lumpkin County, Ga., picked up five Gold awards and two Silvers at the SDIWC, and proved it was no fluke by taking four Golds at the Critics Challenge. Frogtown did very well with Bordeaux- and Rhone-style wines. Barboursville Vineyards in Virginia started the year with a Gold and a Silver at the Winemaker Challenge in January, then ended it with a splash by winning four Gold awards and three Silver awards at the Sommelier Challenge. And another Virginia winery, Jefferson, won a Platinum, four Gold awards and three Silver awards spread over the four competitions. Jefferson's most impressive wine is a red Bordeaux-style blend, and its viognier can be stunning in good vintages.
Castello Banfi's Award-Winning Performances
SDIWC Best Chianti & Platinum 2008 Chianti Classico DOCG Italy $13 Silver 2009 Chianti DOCG Superiore Italy $11 Silver 2007 Chianti Classico DOCG Riserva Italy $18 Silver 2008 Centine Rosso, Toscana IGT Italy $11 Silver 2009 Centine Bianco, Toscana IGT Italy $11 Silver 2010 Rosa Regale, Brachetto d'Acqui DOCG Italy $23 Silver 2007 Belnero, Proprietor's Reserve, Toscana IGT Italy $39 Silver 2008 Rosso di Montalcino DOC Italy $19 Gold 2006 Brunello Di Montalcino DOCG Italy $60 Silver 2009 San Angelo, Pinot Grigio, Toscana IGT Italy $17 CRITICS CHALLENGE
Critics Silver 2008 Chianti Classico DOCG Italy $13 Critics Platinum 2007 Chianti Classico DOCG Riserva Italy $18 Critics Silver 2009 Centine Bianco, Toscana IGT Italy $11 Critics Gold 2009 Centine Rosè, Toscana IGT Italy $11.00 Critics Gold 2010 Rosa Regale, Brachetto d'Acqui DOCG Italy $23 Critics Gold 2009 Rosso di Montalcino DOC Italy $19 Critics Silver 2006 Brunello di Montalcino DOCG Italy $60 SOMMELIER CHALLENGE Gold 2009 Chianti DOCG Superiore Italy $11 Silver 2008 Chianti Classico DOCG Italy $13 Gold 2007 Chianti Classico DOCG Riserva Italy $18 Gold 2008 Centine Rosso, Toscana IGT Italy $11 Gold 2007 Belnero, Proprietor's Reserve, Toscana IGT Italy $39 Silver 2009 Rosso di Montalcino DOC Italy $19 Gold 2006 Brunello Di Montalcino DOCG Italy $60 Gold 2009 Pinot Grigio, San Angelo, Toscano IGT $17
Follow Robert on Twitter at @wineguru.
|
|
December 28, 2011
The Fabulous Five
ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate Choosing a wine of the year is not something I take lightly. Over the course of the past 12 months I have tasted thousands of new wine releases. Most of them do not meet the threshold of character and quality to be considered for such a unique place in my heart. That’s just the way it is. A wine of the year, anyone’s wine of the year, should be a wine that so engaged the taster that its flavors and structure remained seared in the taster’s memory long after the final sip.
Over my more than 20 years as a wine journalist, I have found the decision usually makes itself. One or two wines, occasionally three, tend to stand out, clearly head and shoulders above the rest. This year there are five, the Fabulous Five.
The Fab Five are the 2008 Quintessa Napa Valley Red Wine ($145), 2008 Far Niente Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon ($115), 2009 Freestone Quarter Moon Vineyard Pinot Noir ($75), 2007 Jordan Cabernet Sauvignon ($52) and Iron Horse “Joy” Blanc de Blancs ($100).
There are a few things about my group of finalists that surprise even me. First, and perhaps most obvious, is the cost. None of the wines are what I would call a value wine. That said, if you consider Far Niente, Quintessa and Jordan to be in the same league with the very finest in classified-growth Bordeaux, then the prices don’t seem so daunting. If I had to choose between Chateau Cheval Blanc at $1200 a bottle or Far Niente at $115, I believe I would put my cash on the Far Niente.
The second characteristic that you may notice about my group of finalists is this: They are all produced in California, two in the Napa Valley and three in neighboring Sonoma County. That is very unusual for this confirmed “Old World” wine palate. If you put me in a raft and pushed me out to sea and I could only have one wine to take with me, it would be an Italian red, folks; probably a Barolo or a Brunello.
So that brings me to the most obvious question: why? Why is the Fabulous Five California-centric? The common thread between the five, for me, is that all five represent the finest wines I have ever tasted from these producers. Each wine is an impressive accomplishment from an accomplished producer. Each wine is a triumph unto itself.
I remember tasting the Far Niente. I was working side by side with my top assistant, Rich Cook, as we made our way through a large flight of red-wine samples. We generally work at a different pace and almost never taste the same wine at the same time.
On this day I tasted a gorgeous Cabernet and my head snapped back as if on a string. I turned to Rich, who was having a similar reaction, and we both pointed at the same bottle and uttered in unison: “Oh my God!” It was the 2008 Far Niente Cab. I probably don’t need to explain that Far Niente has been making remarkable Cabernet Sauvignon for about three decades, but I can certainly tell you this is the best one I’ve ever tasted, and I’ve had just about all of them.
At yet another samples tasting I hit upon the voluptuous 2008 Quintessa, which is about as sensual as a red wine could ever be, and I thought I must have tasted my wine of the year then and there. As we often do, I invited friends to stop by the office and snag some of the leftover wines from the day of tasting. I pushed everyone in the direction of the Quintessa and they were more than happy to imbibe.
Eventually the Quintessa was gone and we stood around staring at each other in wonder, all thinking the same thing: How do we top that? As it happened, I had a bottle of the 2007 Jordan Cabernet Sauvignon from Alexander Valley in my computer bag, a bottle that was left over from the Critics Challenge International Wine Competition, where it won a gold medal.
I opened it and shared with the assembled crowd. I’ve been a fan of Jordan Cab since the very first vintage I tasted, which I believe was the 1978. In all of those years I had not tasted a Jordan Cab that was so profound right out of the bottle. It stood out right alongside the brilliant 2008 Quintessa. I was stunned.
My reaction to Freestone’s 2009 Quarter Moon Vineyard Pinot Noir was similar, though for different reasons. I had been under the strong impression that this new winery in the Sonoma Coast appellation would ultimately become renowned for its striking Chardonnays. Outstanding Pinot Noir from California is becoming rather common. Outstanding Chardonnay is rare, so the very best tend to stand out and make their mark more easily and quickly.
Freestone’s Quarter Moon Vineyard Pinot, however, is a wine that speaks to a specific place, with its own unique personality. The ’09 exhibits structure, flavor intensity, and a white pepper spice note that is both unique and compelling. It will give the Freestone Chardonnays a run for their money.
And finally, near the end of this very good year in California wine, I tasted a sparkling wine from the Green Valley of the Russian River Valley that should put Champagne on notice that it doesn’t own the patent on exceptional bubbly.
That would be Iron Horse’s “Joy,” which is a multi-vintage blanc de blancs cuvee that is typically aged on the lees 10 to 15 years prior to disgorgement. It is only sold in magnum, so at $100 retail that comes out to $50 per 750ml, and worth every penny.
It is rich, creamy and toasty, beautifully structured, and exhibits exceptional length, very much after the fashion of a tetes de cuvee from a top Champagne house. The “Joy” cuvee I tasted was bottled in 1997 and disgorged in July of this year. It is not only the finest sparkling wine I’ve tasted from Iron Horse, it’s the finest California sparkling wine I’ve ever tasted. Period.
These are my memories. And memories are what a wine of the year is made of.
Now, the envelope please. My 2011 wine of the year, after careful deliberation, is the 2008 Far Niente Cabernet Sauvignon, which is sourced primarily from the Martin Stelling Vineyard in Oakville, in the sweet spot of the Napa Valley.
Follow Robert on Twitter at @wineguru. |
|
December 20, 2011 The Houses of Piper and Charles ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate REIMS, France — Regis Camus was already something of a legend when he arrived at the state-of-the-art Heidsieck compound in 1994, where he joined another legend, the late Daniel Thibault, to form something of a dream team in the world of Champenois winemakers. The two men had a mission: to restore the great name and reputation of the historic Champagne houses of Piper-Heidsieck and Charles Heidsieck, which had been purchased in the 1980s by the prestigious drinks firm Remy-Cointreau. The project was already well underway, including construction of a modern winemaking facility and a renewed commitment to the core wine of Charles Heidsieck, its non-vintage brut, when Camus and Thibault joined forces. Thibault had previously undertaken the task of shoring up stocks of reserve wines to bolster the quality of the non-vintage Charles Heidsieck, which had been renamed Brut Reserve and rolled out to great acclaim.
In his 1999 book "Champagne for Dummies," author Ed McCarthy wrote: "Thibault's goal was to make a rich, aged, non-vintage Champagne, containing 40 percent reserve wines. The non-vintage Champagne was renamed Brut Reserve, and it has become a total triumph — in fact, one of the great Champagne success stories of the 1990s." Camus inherited the much more difficult task of resurrecting the image of Piper-Heidsieck, which, though much larger than Charles Heidsieck, was on the verge of irrelevance after decades of lackluster performance, with the exception of its always outstanding tetes de cuvee, Rare. "Regis knew that just as Daniel had done with Charles Heidsieck, he had to rebuild the stocks of reserve wines for Charles Heidsieck," Christian Holthausen, communications director for the two houses, told me as he served as interpreter for Regis during an extensive tasting of new base wines and older reserve wines at the Heidsieck complex earlier this month. He got a bit of help from conditions on the ground when the vintages of 1995 and 1996 turned out to be sensational, and then again when the harvests of 2002 and 2004 produced outstanding vintages nearly back to back. Camus succeeded Thibault as chef de cave in 2002, following Thibault's death, and he continued the commitment to "reconstitute" the library of reserve wines.
Of course, holding back great base wines from exceptional vintages makes for less vintage Champagne production, and that creates a problem of its own. "This decision doesn't make the marketing people very happy because there is a clamor for vintage Champagne, and it is easy to sell," said Holthausen. If there were any who doubted the wisdom of Camus at the time, and his obsession with Heidsieck's reserve stocks, they've most likely gone into hiding. The Charles Heidsieck Champagnes have continued to improve under his stewardship, and it's probably safe to say that the Piper-Heidsieck non-vintage brut Champagnes are the success story of the years 2002-2011 in much the same way Charles Heidsieck's Brut Reserve was the success story in the Champagne region through the 1990s. The International Wine Challenge in London, one of the oldest and most prestigious wine competitions in the world, has named Regis Camus Champagne Winemaker of the Year five years running — 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. His role as chef de cave at two important houses — in Wine for Dummies McCarthy ranks both Charles and Piper Heidsieck among the top 25 Champagne houses — is somewhat unusual, but perfectly reasonable given the nature of Champagne. Each house hews to a style that is its own. "One isn't better than the other," Camus says of comparisons between Piper and Charles. "One time, it is a Piper moment. Another time is a Charles moment. The sharp, fruity, mineral style is Piper, the fleshy, generous, pastry style is Charles. They are for different occasions, but equal." Camus explained that he believes Piper is more of a party wine, very convivial and easy to like, while Charles has a more serious side. "When Regis became chef de cave, he said he wanted to give Piper more of a soul, Charles more youth," said Holthausen. Each vintage Camus and his winemaking team taste through the new base wines looking for the characteristics that define the two styles. For Piper, he is seeking wines with what he calls "crunchy" fruit, such as apple and pear. For Charles, he is looking for richer flavors, more flesh and perhaps a bit more complexity.
When he tastes a base wine, Camus said, he considers four options: one, it can be a "Charles" wine; two, it can be a "Piper" wine; three, it can go into either Piper or Charles; and four, it could be a wine that he will set aside for the reserve library. He used the recent harvest of 2011 to make his point. It was the earliest harvest on record in Champagne, and quality was spotty. To make a non-vintage brut that is up to the renewed standards of both Charles and Piper, he will likely use generous amounts of wine from the reserve stocks to maintain the standard of excellence that recent releases of the multi-vintage non-vintage brut Champagnes have come to represent. While many in the wine business, particularly critics, have noticed the tremendous improvement in the wines of Charles and Piper-Heidsieck, the market has yet to catch up. That reality is a beautiful thing for the consumer who has Champagne taste, but a beer budget. I find the Charles Heidsieck Brut Reserve all over for $35 or so, while I can usually snag bottles of Piper-Heidsieck for well below $30. If your holiday plans call for Champagne and you are among the many who are sensitive to the soaring price of this rare and delicious sparkling beverage, you would be hard pressed to do better than the non-vintage Champagnes of Piper and Charles Heidsieck. Follow Robert on Twitter at @wineguru.
|
|
December 17, 2011 An Age Old Argument ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate This Christmas season, I intend to give the gift that keeps on giving. That would be wine with cellar potential. That would be wine that improves with age, as urban legend would have it. And that would be despite the recent controversy, sparked by one famous wine critic who argued that aged wines aren't necessarily all they're cracked up to be. To be sure, many wines made today are as good as they will ever be the moment the cork goes into the bottle. I'm talking about red wines that are, by and large, geared for the wine consumer who craves luscious primary fruit, sweet tannins and soft acidity. The Napa Valley is infamous for its "cocktail Cabs," which would be cabernet sauvignon that is sweet and soft, with virtually no bite (and I would say no backbone) even when served extremely young. There is certainly a market for that, and I would be remiss if I didn't admit that I sometimes enjoy those wines myself. But hang onto them too long, and you've made an expensive mistake.
There is another segment of the wine market, likely much smaller, which treasures a red wine that seems to find another gear, a glorious evolution into an ethereal state, after it has matured a number of years in a decent wine cellar. I've considered all of the fashionable arguments against aged wines. One prominent wine journalist opined that aged wines are an "acquired" taste. Well of course, for most wines are consumed with 72 hours of purchase. And few everyday wine drinkers, the vast majority of the wine-drinking population, have an honest-to-goodness wine cellar. Another offered that he would much rather taste a wine with gobs of fresh fruit than a wine that smelled and tasted of leather, which is one of the aromas you might find in an older red wine. To that I can only respond that too much leather doesn't work for me, either. There is a place, a much better place, between the fresh and obvious nature of a young, fruity red wine and the dried out, leathery red that someone has aged past its prime. Ah, there's the rub. Who determines that place in a wine's life that we would identify as its prime? That would be you. It would be me. The determination that a wine has reached its peak is a matter of subjective personal preference — to each his own! My frame of reference is based upon past experiences with older wines and my own palate. For whatever it's worth, here's what I look for. Color doesn't tell you much about a younger red wine — unless it has spoiled and turned prematurely brown — but it can provide valuable clues to the integrity of an older wine. As they age, white wines and red wines grow closer in color. Reds get lighter and whites get darker. Once, while visiting a chateau in Bordeaux, I was served a red Bordeaux from the 1920s along with a white Bordeaux from the same vintage. The wines were almost identical in color. An older red in good condition will be clear around the rim and a red brink color toward the core. The color orange typically is not a good sign. The smell of the wine is very important. If you poke your nose into the glass and all you can smell is leather, old wood and barnyard, you've come upon a wine well past its peak, in my humble opinion. A great wine at its peak will exhibit those secondary aromas as subtle complexities, with fruit still the dominant note. For me, a large element of greatness in wine is the ability to carry its fruit a decade or more. Once the fruit is gone and the secondary aromas have taken command, even a great wine is merely a shadow of what it once was.
Taste is what it comes down to in the final analysis. For example, just in the course of doing my job I taste young red Bordeaux and Burgundy and young california cabernet sauvignon and pinot noir. I know what they taste like at that stage and certainly appreciate whatever level of quality they have achieved at a young age. But when I dive into my cellar for a special wine to serve with dinner, I almost never select a Bordeaux, Burgundy, brunello, Barolo or California cabernet that doesn't have at least 10 years of age. That's how long it takes to begin to soften the tannins and round out the acidity of the truly outstanding red wines from the best vintages. This is important for three reasons. No. 1, the astringency and bite have been tamed with age. For some wines from some vintages, more than 10 years might be required to achieve this level of smoothness. No. 2, I would argue that the best wines can actually exhibit more fruit 10 years out than they did upon release. That's because the wall of tannin you might find in a well-made young red wine — particularly a Bordeaux or Burgundy — masks the fruit to some extent. As the tannin recedes (over time it literally drops out of the wine and forms sediment at the bottom of the bottle) the primary fruit aromas flourish and the wine really begins to shine. No. 3, as the wine is transformed through the aging process, the more subtle so-called secondary aromas find their voice, and the wine is simply more complex and delivers a greater degree of sophistication and elegance than it did when it was all youthful fruit, tannin and acid. Of course, the proof is, as always, in the bottle. You must take the 10-year taste test yourself to decide whether or not aged wines are a taste worth acquiring. |
|
November 25, 2011 Two Great After-Dinner Wines ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate The beauty of the holiday season, in my humble opinion, is the sheer scope of the Epicurean possibilities. The season of festivity stretches on for several weeks and gives me an excuse to indulge in myriad adult beverages of great import, and we end it all with firm resolve to undo the damage to the waistline in the coming year. It is at this time of year that I permit myself the sinful pleasures of decadent ports and sherries, exquisite single-malt scotch, and the occasional snifter of cognac or Armagnac, libations that I generally save for special occasions.
This year, I am especially focused on the dessert wines in my cellar, for it has been an exceptional time for these delicious but often misunderstood gems. It is my sense that our wine culture has evolved in recent years and that more wine enthusiasts are coming around to the proposition that there is a time and place for sticky sweet wine. Twice this year, I have witnessed professional wine judges vote dessert wines the top award at a major international wine competition. In April, the Rancho de Philo Triple Cream Sherry ($35) won the honor as Wine of the Year at the 28th annual San Diego International Wine Competition. In September, Inniskillin's 2007 Vidal Icewine ($60) received the same accolade at the third annual Sommelier Challenge. Both dessert wines triumphed over prestigious and ostensibly more popular dry table wines. Of course, their remarkable successes in those two wine shows begged the questions: When do you drink those wines, and with what? The time to drink them is now. What to drink them with is a matter of personal preference. I plan to serve the Inniskillin ice wines I've stashed with savory cheeses. To my palate, these wines are so sweet they are a bit of overkill when served with a dessert course. You can do it, and you may well come up with an exceptional match, but runny, smelly cheeses make the best match for me. Besides the winning Vidal ice wine, Inniskillin also won Platinum awards with its 2006 Vidal Gold Icewine ($77) and its 2007 Riesling Icewine ($80). The Inniskillin ice wines are made in the Niagara Peninsula region in Ontario, Canada, from grapes, as the name suggests, that have frozen on the vine before they were harvested. This technique concentrates the sugars and flavors, and produces intensely sweet and flavorful dessert wines that are much prized by connoisseurs. Note that the prices are for 375 ml bottles and that the alcohol by volume of the ice wines is below 10 percent for each, making these wines easy to enjoy after a big holiday feast because they don't pack huge alcohol wallop.
Rancho Cucamonga's Triple Cream Sherry has been one of the most consistent winners in my nearly 20 years of wine competition experience. It is made with mission grapes, using the solera method that is familiar in southern Spain, and the wine is fortified, coming in at 18.5 percent alcohol by volume. I sometimes serve it with creme brulee or flan to pick up on its seductive spiciness. It is also good with mild cheeses or candied nuts, but more often than not I simply sip it as a digestivo in front of the fire after dinner. |
|
November 1, 2011 The Magnificent Seven ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate It is often said there is no other sparkling wine quite like Champagne. I have even said it myself. The chalky soils of the region seem to imbue Champagne, the real thing, with structure and complexity that is difficult, if not impossible, to reproduce elsewhere. It isn't as though no one has tried, for wherever wine is made there always seems to be someone who will take a stab at a bubbly rendition. Scan the globe, and you will find sparkling wines produced from Tasmania to Turkey, and nearly everywhere in between. Some of it is very good; some not so much.
Champagne's strongest competition in the world of luxury bubbly (with apologies to Spain, which has seen cava quality improve dramatically) comes from Italy and the United States. The Franciacorta district in northern Italy, between Milan and Venice, produces Italy's finest sparkling wines, many of which rival Champagne in both quality and price. In the United States, the epicenter of luxury sparkling is California, specifically Napa, Sonoma and Mendocino. While fine bubblies are made in the Eastern United States around the Finger Lakes and on Long Island, those wines are not widely distributed and are difficult to source. The best of the California bubblies can hold their own with the finest Champagnes, and have often prevailed in blind tastings that pitted highly rated Champagne against sparkling wines from top-tier California producers. California sparklers have improved dramatically over the past 30 years, overcoming early criticism that they were "too fruity" and lacking the structure to age. That is certainly not the case any longer. One producer, Gloria Ferrer, ages its most prestigious wine — Carneros Cuvee — on the yeast lees for nine years before disgorgement. Iron Horse and Schramsberg have prestige cuvees that are made in a similar style.
As we approach the holidays, there will be numerous occasions that call for top-of-the-line bubbly. The beauty of the finest bubblies from California is that, while not cheap, they are economical luxury wines when compared to Champagnes of comparable quality. The following, in alphabetical order, is my selection of the seven most reliable producers of super-premium California sparkling wine. Domaine Carneros, located in the Carneros district of the Napa Valley, is owned by the Taittinger Champagne house and produces perhaps the most elegant of California bubblies, Le Reve Blanc de Blancs ($95). It is usually made from 100 percent chardonnay, but sometimes includes a splash of pinot blanc in the blend. It is aged six years on the lees prior to disgorgement, and will easily age another six to 10 years after it is released. The 2007 Brut ($26) and 2008 Brut Rose ($36) are the best bets for value.
Gloria Ferrer, located on the Sonoma side of the Carneros district, was founded by Jose and Gloria Ferrer, from Spain's Catalonia region, where they established the cava powerhouse, Frexienet. They've always made very good sparkling wine in California, but probably weren't considered top tier until their very first vintage of Carneros Cuvee narrowly edged the 1996 Dom Perignon for Best of Show sparkling wine at the Monterey Wine Competition four to five years ago. While the current vintage of Carneros Cuvee (2000, $50) is superb, the Gloria Ferrer that has my attention is the 2004 Royal Cuvee at $32. This wine consistently triumphs at major international wine competitions, and never disappoints. If only I had bought more when it was retailing for about $20! Other major award winners for Gloria Ferrer are the 2006 Blanc de Blancs ($28) and the non-vintage extra-dry Va de Vi ($22).
Iron Horse, located in the Green Valley, the coolest section of Sonoma County's Russian River Valley, produces two of the most scintillating bubblies made in California. Both — the multi-vintage Joy and the 2003 LD — can go head-up against just about anything Champagne could throw at them. Joy ($179) is only sold in magnum. It is a rich, complex, beautifully structure multi-vintage bubbly that is aged on the lees for 10 to 15 years (depending upon the cuvee) before release. The newly released LD (Late Disgorged) retails for $85 and is Iron Horse's prestige cuvee. If you are seeking value, try the Russian Cuvee or the Wedding Cuvee, both priced at $38. These are delightful sparklers that are aged far less (typically three years) than the prestige cuvees prior to disgorgement.
J Vineyards & Winery, located in the heart of Sonoma County's Russian River Valley, probably offers the greatest value in California sparkling wine today. Both the 2002 J Vintage Brut ($40) and non-vintage J Brut Rose ($28) are refined and elegant, but neither comes with the hefty price tag of comparable bubblies. They are perhaps a bit more fruit-driven than some of their close competitors and rivals, but in a good way. These are simply delicious wines.
Mumm Napa Valley is situated along the Silverado Trail in the Napa Valley, but sources most of its finest grapes from the Carneros district. Found by the G.H. Mumm Champagne house of Reims, France, Mumm has long been a benchmark for quality at all ends of the price spectrum within the luxury sparkling category. The 2003 DVX ($60) was a double-gold medal winner at the San Francisco International Wine Competition and has been among the elite prestige cuvees from California since its inception in the early 1990s. Yet the relatively inexpensive Brut Prestige ($22) and the non-vintage Brut Reserve ($36) are superb wines that offer both quality as well as value. Roederer Estate, located in Mendocino's cool Anderson Valley, has making some of California's finest bubbly for more than two decades. Founded by the Roederer Champagne house, Roederer Estate mirrors the parent company's commitment to sparkling wine of intrinsic depth, character and complexity. The Roederer Estate Brut ($23) is a non-vintage bubbly that I have inserted many times into tastings of non-vintage Champagnes at twice the price, and it always holds its own. The prestige cuvee, the 2002 L'Ermitage ($50) is simply a magnificent example of the greatness California bubblies can achieve. Schramsberg, located at the northern end of the Napa Valley, in Calistoga, was the first in California to attempt to produce sparkling wines that could be competitive with Champagne. It was largely the success of Hugh and Jamie Davies that attracted the French Champagne houses to California to begin with. It wasn't easy for the Davies, for both chardonnay and pinot noir, the primary grapes used in the production of wines made in the "Champagne" method, were not readily available when they opened shop in 1965. They persevered and ultimately established numerous benchmarks in the evolution of California bubbly. Their prestige cuvee, J Schram, is arguably one of the top-three sparkling wines made in California. The 2004 vintage currently retails for $100, as does their scintillating 2003 Reserve Brut. The 2008 Blanc de Blancs ($38) and the 2008 Brut Rose ($41) are exceptional wines as well, though not as complex or structured as the prestige wines.
Follow Robert on Twitter at @wineguru.
|
|
October 18, 2011 Bubbly for the Holidays ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate
As I rummaged through the wine cellar to pull together a charitable silent auction item appropriately dubbed "Holiday Bubbles" in the auction program, it suddenly occurred to me that with each bottle I chose I had a specific type of social event in mind. For the casual aperitif prior to an evening on the town, I reached instinctively for an inexpensive but delicious Italian prosecco. Thinking about serving savory appetizers in front of the fire on a crisp winter day, I went for an interesting Spanish cava.
As I conjured up a dressy, festive holiday buffet, I couldn't resist a non-vintage brut Champagne, and so on. "Sparkling" is indeed a diverse category of wine, often encompassing wines with little in common other than the fizz. Just about every wine producing region in the world makes wine with bubbles. So with that in mind, I will begin with the most basic — and misunderstood — fact about sparkling wine: All Champagne is sparkling wine, but not all sparkling wine is Champagne. To qualify as Champagne, a sparkling wine must be produced within the strict boundaries of the Champagne district northeast of Paris. There is a tendency to call all bubbly "Champagne" no matter its origin, but that is simply not the case. Sparkling wines produced in other parts of France are typically labeled cremant, and the birthplace of all sparkling wine, the Abbey of St. Hilaire in southern France's Languedoc region, makes the superb blanquette de Limoux. Italy also is a prolific producer of bubbly, with everything from the sweet red sparkler, Brachetto d'Acqui (made in the Piedmont region, where Barolo and Barbaresco are the king and queen), to exquisite methode champenoise-style bubblies from Franciacorta, a region that lies between Milan and Venice in northern Italy. Italy is famous, too, for its sweet Asti spumante and prosecco, an increasingly popular sparkling wine from the Veneto region.
Spain has its cava, of course, and the rest of the world relies for the most part on the nomenclature of style, such as brut or extra dry — terms that define the sweetness level of the various sparkling wine styles. There are still some sparkling wine producers in the U.S. market that insist upon calling their bubbly "Champagne," but that is now the exception rather than the rule. In keeping with my observation that certain bubbly styles conjure, and consequently match up better, with certain types of social events, I have decided for the purposes of this exercise to group my sparkling wine preferences using just that model. CASUAL APERITIF
There are numerous opportunities around the holidays to meet up with friends for a brief aperitif after work or a shopping tussle at the mall. For such casual and convivial encounters, prosecco, cava or any of the many cremant wines of France — cremant de Alsace, cremant de Loire, cremant de Limoux (a kissing cousin of blanquette de Limoux) — will serve you well. These wines are light and easy, but hardly lacking in flavor or character when made well. They have the added benefit of being inexpensive relative to the cost of Champagne or any of the good California bubblies. TAPAS While the cremant-style bubblies can certainly stand up to food, some dishes work best with bubblies that have firmer acid and a little more snap. So when serving savory tapas at a party or ordering in a restaurant, more structured sparkling wines will be more likely to handle the challenge with elan.
In that setting, I generally look to non-vintage California bruts and non-vintage brut Champagnes that fall below my price threshold for such occasions, which is about $40 retail, or $65 to $70 at restaurant prices. If the tapas are both sweet and savory, I might also include "extra dry" bubbly in the mix, for the additional sweetness (indeed, extra dry is sweeter than brut) will match well with tapas that are either on the sweet side or meant to be dipped in a sweet sauce. It should be noted that there are bone-dry sparkling wines, typically labeled "natural" or "brut zero," but without the dosage (a liqueur that is added at bottling to balance the wine and reduce the acid bite) these wines can be too sharp for many palates. ELEGANT RECEPTIONS Glitzy dress-up holiday parties might be the occasion to bring out more upscale non-vintage bruts, non-vintage rose Champagne (more expensive than a simple non-vintage brut) and perhaps even some vintage wines, either from Champagne, California, Italy or Spain. Other countries have sparklers that might fit into this category, but they are not easily found unless you have access to a large wine market such as New York, Washington, D.C., or Los Angeles. These bubblies will be more refined and complex, and definitely more compatible, with the more complicated appetizers served at fancy affairs. Rule of thumb: If caviar is being served, the bubblies should be a cut above, or what's the point? SIT-DOWN DINNERS
If you're ever going to serve vintage Champagne, tetes de cuvee Champagne or any of the prestige cuvees from California that run $50 and up, this would be the time. Structured, complex sparkling wines, particularly those that have been appropriately aged, can be a huge hit at the holiday feasting table. I'm particularly fond of vintage rose Champagne with roasted game birds, but you would be surprised in general with how well vintage bubbly matches up with just about everything except bloody red meat. SWEETS Over the years, I've encountered too many fairly savvy wine enthusiasts who simply don't get sweet bubbly. If you fall into that camp, be aware there is a brave new (not really new) bubbly world out there, and it's worth experiencing, even if sweet wines are generally not your thing. Sweet bubblies are meant to be paired with sweet things. Hence the affection Italians have for Asti spumante. In Italy, Asti spumante is served with cakes and cookies, and around the holidays the combination makes for sheer joy. One of my favorite combinations is brachetto D'acqui with chocolate. Champagne with chocolate — unless the Champagne is a demi-sec — is a huge no-no, but brachetto d'Acqui and chocolate is as sublime as any wine and food pairing could ever be. The brachetto delivers a delicious burst of raspberry fruit that is simply magic with a chocolate sweet. The beauty, too, of Asti spumante and brachetto and other demi-sec sparkling wines is that they tend to be much lower in alcohol. Brachetto often registers about 7 percent alcohol by volume. Most bruts, for example, check in at between 12.5 and 13.5 percent ABV. RECOMMENDATIONS There are many excellent sparkling wine producers from which to choose, and you are almost always assured of a satisfactory experience if you choose a wine from an established Champagne house or a top California producer.
To somewhat narrow the possibilities, my suggestions today are based upon sparkling wines I have tasted over the past 12 months at various wine competitions. The big discovery for me in sparkling wine this year has been Sparkling Pointe, a producer from Long Island, N.Y. Sparkling Pointe had the top sparkling wine at the 2011 San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition and placed two wines in the championship round of the Critics Challenge International Wine Competition. You might have difficulty finding Sparkling Pointe, however, unless you live on the East Coast. Another pleasant surprise was Vilarnau, a Spanish cava producer that won Platinum, Gold and Silver awards at the Critics Challenge with wines that retail for less than $20 each. Cavas from Freixenet and Segura Viudas also left their mark at the Sommelier Challenge in September, when Freixenet prevailed with the Best of Class cava.
The Champagne that impressed most in this year's competitions was G.H. Mumm with its non-vintage Brut Rose ($75), voted Wine of the Year at the 2011 Critics Challenge. Over the past few years, Champagne Mumm has made tremendous strides toward restoring an image that was tarnished somewhat by a lackluster decade or so of production. From Italy, the proseccos Maschio and Caposaldo piled up the Gold awards at both the Critics and Sommelier Challenges, with wines that retail for $15 or less. Domestically, the banner-winning wines have been Gloria Ferrer's vastly improved Royal Cuvee ($35) and the superb prestige cuvee from Domaine Carneros by Taittinger, Le Reve ($90). Both wines have performed consistently with numerous Gold and Platinum awards over the past year. Follow Robert on Twitter at @wineguru. To find out more about Robert Whitley and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com. |
|
October 11, 2011 Somms Know Value ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate
You wouldn't ordinarily think value when seeking a wine recommendation from a professional sommelier. After all, they dwell in the rarefied air of Napa Valley cult wines, trendy Garagiste Bordeaux and the occasional 100-point bottle that would surely make you gasp at the price. Of course, that's the stereotype. The reality is somewhat different. The wave of hip, young sommeliers now managing large wine inventories in top-notch restaurants from New York to San Francisco has grasped the art of the deal. For proof, thumb through the wine list the next time you dine out and order the least expensive bottle. You might be surprised. It has been my experience that the best sommeliers pride themselves on discovering inexpensive gems. That was so true at the recent Sommelier Challenge International Wine Competition in San Diego. To be sure, big-ticket wines such as Parallel Estate Cabernet Sauvignon ($135), Chateau St. Jean Cinq Cepages ($75) and Archery Summit Pinot Noir ($100) swept their share of the awards, but there were an impressive number of winners that retail for $20 or less.
One judge, Lisa Redwine, wine director at both the Marine Room and The Shores in La Jolla, Calif., enthusiastically confided in me that her panel had tasted several outstanding Spanish cavas. The significance is that Redwine understands that most cava is not very expensive by sparkling wine standards. Didn't matter; she loved them. This aroused my curiosity in what I would consider the "value" winners from the 2011 Sommelier Challenge. There are too many of these wines to comment on each one individually, so I have culled out a number of those that I personally found interesting and that I believe might be easily sourced. The largest group of value winners came from Italy, which immediately got my attention because Italian cuisine is such an important segment of our restaurant culture. Banfi was a huge winner with four medals for its inexpensive lineup of Chianti and red Tuscan blends that retail between $11 and $18. The 2008 Centine Rosso ($11) and 2007 Chianti Classico Riserva ($18) are personal favorites. Cecchi scored a Platinum Award with its 2008 Chianti Classico ($13) and a Silver with its 2009 Bonzio Sangiovese di Maremma ($9).
Ruffino, which won Best Chianti with the 2007 Riserva Ducale Chianti Classico ($24.99), took three additional awards with wines that retail for less than $12 a bottle.
And anyone looking for tasty but inexpensive bubbly for the holidays can quench that thirst with either the Maschio Brut Prosecco ($13), which won a Gold Award, or the Caposaldo Prosecco DOC ($15), which won a Silver. Caposaldo also won Gold for its Chianti and Pinot Grigio, both at $10. The most medaled wines among the bubblies, however, were the cavas. Freixenet walked off with the award for Best Cava with its Elyssia Pinot Noir Brut Cava ($18), and three other medals, including two Golds. Segura Viudas had a Platinum winner with its Aria Brut Cava ($14) as well as a Gold and Silver award for its Aria Pinot Noir Brut ($14) and Brut Reserva Heredad ($20). Value in the southern hemisphere was well represented by Australia's Wakefield winery, from the Barossa Valley, which took eight medals, seven of those with wines that retail for $16.99 or less. It won Gold with its 2010 Clare Valley Riesling, 2009 South Australia Chardonnay and 2008 Clare Valley Shiraz, all priced at $16.99. Argentina had a tremendous value wine in the Amalaya 2009 Vino Tinto de Altura, Valle Calchaqui ($17), which won a Platinum Award. New Zealand achieved nice value wins with a Gold for the Starborough 2010 Savignon Blanc, Marlborough ($13) and a Silver for the 2008 Boro Hills Pinot Noir, Central Otago ($9.99). Chile scored with a Silver for the Emiliana 2010 Natura Sauvignon Blanc, Valle de Casablanca ($9). On the domestic front, I was pleased to see Alma Rosa take a Silver with its 2009 Chardonnay, Santa Barbara County ($19). Don't let the screw cap fool you; this is a first-class wine from the legendary vintner, Richard Sanford.
The most impressive performance by a domestic winery, in terms of value, was turned in my Navarro Vineyards of Mendocino County. Navarro is a family run winery in Mendocino's Anderson Valley that has a long track record for quality wine at a reasonable price. Navarro won five awards, including Best Riesling with the 2010 Anderson Valley Riesling ($18), and three Gold Awards (Muscat Blanc, Gewurztraminer and Pinot Gris), all from the 2010 vintage and all priced at $19. Estancia, located in Monterey County, picked up six awards, including Gold for its 2009 Pinnacles Ranches Chardonnay ($11.99). Estancia's five Silver winners (for Cabernet, Merlot, Pinot Noir, Pinot Grigio and Sauvignon Blanc) range in price from $11.99 to $15.99. Having tasted almost all of these winning wines myself, the bottom line for me is that the Sommeliers pretty much got it right, regardless of price. Complete results, including many more exceptional value winners, can be found at SommelierChallenge.com. Follow Robert on Twitter at @wineguru. To find out more about Robert Whitley and read more of his Wine Talk columns, visit the Creators Syndicate website at Creators.com. |
|
October 9, 2011 Great Wines for Hard Times ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate With so much troubling economic news on every front these days, it seems now would be a good time for wine enthusiasts to once again take stock of their options in the value wine market. My definition of a value wine is a wine that over-delivers on its quality-price ratio. Simply being cheap does not qualify a wine for the value distinction. It's got to be very, very yummy, too. Today, I've set the value bar at $20. There are a remarkable number of truly outstanding wines that will cost you less. Here are but a few: Saint-Hilaire Blanquette de Limoux from the Languedoc region in the south of France is by far the world's best value in sparkling wine at about $13. This bubbly brut is produced near the historic village where sparkling wine was made by the monks perhaps a century before Dom Perignon carried the idea back to Champagne following a pilgrimage.
Clos de los Siete is a gorgeous red blend from Mendoza, Argentina, inspired by the masterful winemaker Michel Rolland of Bordeaux. It is one of his many projects in Argentina, a wine producing country that has held Rolland's fascination for at least two decades. Clos de los Siete is primarily a Bordeaux-style blend with a dollop of Syrah. It's a beautifully structured red that will certainly improve in the cellar, and it retails for about $19. Zocker Paragon Vineyard Gruner Veltliner from California's Edna Valley is the finest domestic Gruner I've yet tasted. This brilliant wine from the Burgundy-born winemaking genius Christian Roguenant runs about $18. Gruner Veltliner from its native Austria is all the rage at wine bars across America, but domestic Gruner is fairly new and not very well known. There is a small amount of Gruner planted in New York, a bit more in California and a miniscule amount in Oregon. Zocker is the only one that could pass from an Austrian Gruner, with its steely structure and attractive minerality.
Bonny Doon Syrah 'Le Pousseur' is made in the earthy European style that winemaker Randall Grahm favors. It won't blow you away with ripe fruit or powerful levels of alcohol, but that's one of the aspects of this wine I appreciate most. Le Pousseur is made from grapes sourced throughout the Central Coast of California, where much of the finest domestic Syrah is grown, and it is quite literally among the best California Syrahs in production today. It carries a suggested retail tag of about $17, but I routinely find it for $15 or less. Olivier Leflaive Chablis Les Deux Rives is a simple village Chablis that just makes it under the wire at $20. First of all, Olivier Leflaive is one of the top producers in Burgundy, and his wines always exude quality and class, regardless of price. Most important, however, is this wine's position in the small world of Chablis Villages — it is consistently one of the best, and in good vintages it is very, very good, with all of the mineral and flint characteristics of more expensive Chablis.
Banfi Chianti Classico is a relatively new project for the well regarded Castello Banfi estate of Brunello di Montalcino fame, but the early results have been spectacular. The Chianti Classico Riserva is an exceptional Chianti that retails in the $18 range. This one's good for this evening's roasted chicken with herbs, or you could lay it down in the cellar and watch it improve over the next decade or so. The more simple Chianti Classico is a smooth, juicy beauty in the $13 range, and you can drink it anytime, starting now. Feudi di San Gregorio produces some of the finest wines made in southern Italy, including the legendary Aglianico di Taurasi, 'Serpico.' But you don't have to pay a Serpico price to get one of the great wines from this estate. Feudi di San Gregorio's Falanghina, made from grapes grown in the Sannio district of Campania, is a luscious white that exhibits notes of white flower, honey and minerals, with excellent balance, mouth-watering acidity and a long, persistent finish. It is one of my favorite whites to drink the year round, and it retails for about $15. Eberle Winery Vineyard Selection Cabernet Sauvignon is one of Eberle's most consistent winners on the wine competition circuit. The fruit is pure Paso Robles, with some of it coming off the Eberle estate and the rest from neighboring grape growers that proprietor Gary Eberle has nurtured over the past quarter-century. Each vintage, it seems this wine picks up gold medals with the greatest of ease because of its true Cabernet character and exceptional flavor and balance. The suggested retail price is $19, but I often find it for less.
Click here for more of Robert Whitley's Wine Talk columns at Creators.com. Follow Robert on Twitter @wineguru. Email Robert at whitleyonwine@yahoo.com. |
|
October 8, 2011
ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate The Sommelier Challenge International Wine Competition ended on a sweet note last month in San Diego as the distinguished panel of wine professionals voted an ice wine from Canada's Niagara Peninsula Wine of the Year at the annual event. Though it faced stiff opposition in the championship round from an array of impressive wines from a number of the world's most well-regarded producers, the Inniskillin 2007 Vidal Ice Wine ($60) narrowly prevailed.
Ice wine, for the uninitiated, is a wine that is made from grapes picked after they've frozen on the vine, a technique that was originally perfected in Germany. The result is a wine that is very concentrated and intensely sweet. Ice wines are typically served after dinner with cheeses, or during the course of a meal with foie gras. Ice wines are expensive to produce because yields are extremely low, which makes them a rare and expensive treat. Inniskillin entered three ice wines, and all three were voted Platinum awards and pushed forward into the championship round. Sommelier Challenge III brought together a dozen sommeliers from New York, San Francisco, Napa Valley, Los Angeles and San Diego to judge 657 entries from 17 countries. Among the top winners was perennial competition favorite Gloria Ferrer, which aced the vote for Best of Show sparkling wine with its 2002 Royal Cuvee Brut ($32), a wine that has had an impressive run in major wine competitions over the past two years. Gloria Ferrer also saw its 2008 Estate Chardonnay, Carneros ($18), advance to the finals.
Best of Show red wine was awarded to Bracey Vineyards for its 2006 Howell Mountain, Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon ($65). To win Best Red, the Bracey had to survive a runoff that included Chateau St. Jean's 2007 Cinq Cepages, Sonoma County ($75), ColSolare 2007 Red Wine, Columbia Valley ($75) and Domaine Carneros 2008 Pinot Noir, The Famous Gate, Carneros ($68). The Cinq Cepages and ColSolare had to settle for a tie as Best Bordeaux Blend, and Domaine's Carneros' The Famous Gate was the runaway winner as Best Pinot Noir. Voting for Best of Show white wine produced a value gem from New York's Finger Lakes region, with a Sheldrake Point Vineyard 2010 Gewurztraminer ($15) emerging as the winner. This was a beautifully balanced white from perhaps America's premier growing region for this particular grape variety. Sheldrake Point was a narrow winner in the vote for Best White over the Rodney Strong Vineyards 2009 Chardonnay Reserve, Russian River Valley ($35). The category for Best Fortified also produced a very close vote, with the Commandaria Alasia, Cyprus ($23) prevailing by one vote over a beautiful sherry from Spain's Gonzalez Byass, the Solera 1847 Oloroso Dulce, Jerez ($20). The Cypriot winner was made in a sweet sherry style.
There were numerous other outstanding performances. I've singled out some of the more interesting winners: Eberle Winery of Paso Robles was named Winery of the Year. Eberle entered 14 wines and medaled with 13 of them, including a Platinum award for its 2007 Estate Cabernet Sauvignon ($34). As director, I evaluate the results and select the top performance based upon consistency and quality of awards. Besides the Platinum, Eberle earned Gold awards for its 2008 Cabernet Sauvignon/Syrah ($29), its 2007 Reserve Cabernet Sauvignon ($75), its 2009 Steinbeck Vineyard Syrah ($21) and its 2010 Muscat Canelli ($14). Barboursville Vineyards has long been among the top wineries in Virginia, and that fact was evident by the number of awards — six — that Barboursville racked up, as well as the quality of the awards. This sterling example of the potential for Virginia wine won four Gold awards: 2007 Octagon ($39.99), 2009 Cabernet Franc Reserve ($22.99), 2010 Viognier Reserve ($21.99) and 2010 Vermentino Reserve ($21.99). All of the Barboursville winners carry a Virginia appellation. Jefferson Vineyards is another superb Virginia winery, and it's located on the site of Thomas Jefferson's original vineyard plantings. Jefferson scored Gold awards with its 2010 Chardonnay, Reserve Monticello ($21.95) and its 2010 Pinot Gris, Virginia ($18.95). They say Virginia is for wine lovers. Now I believe it. Castello Banfi of Brunello di Montalcino fame and its sister property in the Chianti district of Tuscany swept eight awards, and six of those were Gold. Castello Banfi won Gold with the 2007 Belnero Proprietor's Reserve, Toscana IGT ($39), the 2006 Brunello di Montalcino DOCG ($55) and the 2009 San Angelo Pinot Grigio, Toscana IGT ($17). The Chianti wing of Banfi took Gold awards for its 2009 Chianti DOCG Superiore ($11), the 2007 Chianti Classico Riserva DOCG ($18) and the 2008 Centine Rosso, Toscana IGT ($11).
Bouchaine Vineyards of the Napa Valley's Carneros district only entered four wines but claimed two Platinums with its 2008 Estate Pinot Noir ($30) and its 2009 Estate Chardonnay ($25). The 2010 Bouche d'Or Chardonnay ($30) won Gold. Winery at Holy Cross Abbey acquitted itself well, representing the growing Colorado wine industry with five awards, including Platinum for a 2009 Cabernet Franc ($29) and a 2008 Syrah Reserve ($30). Both of those wines carry the Colorado appellation on the label. Rodney Strong Vineyards of Sonoma County was among the first California wineries to take chardonnay seriously and plant it copiously. As a result, chardonnay has always been a Rodney Strong strength. That manifest itself in the Best Chardonnay award with its 2009 Chardonnay Reserve, Russian River Valley ($35). It was a very good weekend for Rodney Strong, winning 10 medals overall. Parallel Vineyards of the Napa Valley entered two wines and walked off with Platinum and Gold for its two stellar Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignons, the Estate ($125) and the Napa Valley ($55). The winemaker is the renowned Philippe Melka. Complete results of the 2011 Sommelier Challenge, as well as the names and background of the participating sommeliers, can be found at SommelierChallenge.com. Click here for more of Robert Whitley's Wine Talk columns at Creators.com. Follow Robert on Twitter at @wineguru. |
|
October 7, 2011
ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate Once upon a time, Burgundy was the wine aficionados reached for when they visited their favorite wine merchant. Back in the day, very few grocery stores could legally sell wine, so there really were honest-to-goodness wine merchants. It was a time when French wine ruled the retail shops, and Burgundy was considered pure poetry by those who fancied themselves in the know. Then California happened, followed by Australia. New Zealand wines were sizzling for a while, and now it's Spain and Argentina. Everyone seems to be looking for the best new thing. But here's a flash. Burgundy is back, thanks largely to consecutive vintages — 2009 and 2010 — that are not only very good, but also not as expensive as you might imagine given the weakness of the dollar. The Burgundies of 2009 are just now hitting the stores.
The problem — and it's the only problem — is that the new wine consumer barely knows that Burgundy is the home of pinot noir and chardonnay, let alone the esoteric classifications that serve as the guide to quality and price. So it seems that with these two outstanding vintages just beginning to be commercially available, a few basic observations on Burgundy might be in order. CLASSIFICATIONS Grand cru is the top tier of wine in Burgundy. Grand cru wines come from the best vineyards in the top villages. They are rare and expensive, even in vintages that are not as highly regarded as 2009 and 2010. The next level down is premier cru. From a good producer in an outstanding year these wines are almost always superb, if not downright spectacular. In fact, a handful of premier cru vineyards are consistently on par with nearby grand cru vineyards and probably should be upgraded, but that will never happen because of the nature of the political landscape. The next level is the village wine. These wines come from vineyards that surround specific villages, and thus take the village name. Many of Burgundy's best and most enlightened producers often blend grapes from their premier cru vineyards into their village wines to improve the quality, which makes village wine perhaps the best value in Burgundy, particularly in good vintages. The most basic level of Burgundy is Bourgogne, which can be a blend of grapes from anywhere in the region. Most Bourgogne is inexpensive and generally regarded as the entry-level Burgundy for those who need an introduction to the earthy qualities that distinguish Burgundy from many New World pinot noirs and chardonnays.
REGIONS
Burgundy is vast and diverse, with a hierarchy that is based on place. Chablis is the northernmost district, about an hour south of Paris, and produces a flinty, minerally white wine that is renowned for the absence of oak in the production of the region's wines. That is slowly changing, although oaked Chablis is primarily the domain of Chablis from grand cru vineyards. The Cote d'or is the most important corridor in Burgundy. It runs north-south and encompasses what are considered Burgundy's two most influential districts, the Cote de Nuits and Cote de Beaune. Generally speaking, the Cote de Nuits is most famous for red and Cote de Beaune most famous for whites, though the Cote de Beaune does boast a couple of villages — Volnay and Pommard — that are quite famous for red wine. The reds and whites from the Cote Chalonnaise and the whites from Maconnais, both regions south of Beaune, produce solid wines that are reliably good, of not necessarily on par with the wines of the Cote d'Or. Still further south, not far from Lyon, lies Beaujolais, where the grape is gamay rather than pinot noir, and the wines are lighter and fruitier, meant to be consumed relatively young and fresh. BUYING STRATEGY In good vintages, the premier cru and village wines of Burgundy offer ordinary folk an opportunity to purchase cellar-worthy Burgundy at modest prices. These wines age remarkably well and improve as the firm acids and hard tannins that are typical of young red Burgundy soften over time. White Burgundy tends to flesh out and gain palate weight as it ages, developing intriguing flavor complexity along the way.
I wouldn't hesitate to purchase village wines from the 2009 and 2010 vintages of Burgundy. They will be good to drink young and should be fairly sensational upon reaching maturity. This is where the value is. That said, many of the premier cru reds, which I tasted extensively at the Hospices de Beaune in November 2010, are impressive wines that are certainly collector or special occasion worthy. There will be values at the premier cru level as well because, frankly, the strongest global demand for Burgundy is in the high-dollar-value grand cru wines, which get sucked up by rich collectors, Michelin-grade restaurants and the ever voracious Asian market. To get you started, on the Wine Review Online Reviews page I've recommended a few village wines from Joseph Drouhin, a top Burgundy negociant. They are the best evidence I can present that Burgundy is not only back, but at a fair price, too. Click here for more of Robert Whitley's Wine Talk columns at Creators.com. Follow Robert on Twitter at @wineguru. |
|
October 5, 2011
Merlot's Sweet Spot
ROBERT WHITLEY Creators Syndicate
Foraging through the wine cellar, as I often do before dinner, I’ve discovered recently that over the years I’ve tucked away a fair amount of Merlot. You heard that right, Merlot, the wine that was so famously bashed in the Academy Award-nominated movie, Sideways.You may wonder what I was thinking, given that interest in Merlot waned and sales tanked after it became cool to diss Merlot. Call me an opportunist. I’ve always thought Merlot grown in the right location is capable of producing world class red wine. The clay soils of Pomerol, in the Right Bank of Bordeaux, would be the best example. That is where Petrus, the most sought-after and expensive Bordeaux, is made. And Merlot is the dominant grape in neighboring Saint-Emilion. So much for the illogical conclusion of many, drawn from the movie, that Merlot is a mediocre grape.Tuscany is another part of the world where Merlot thrives. You may not have noticed, but since Merlot was added to the list of permitted grape varieties the Chianti region has had fewer disastrous vintages. Because it ripens earlier than Sangiovese, Tuscany’s most important grape, Merlot has become Tuscany’s hedge against the sometimes cold, wet harvests that can ruin the Sangiovese crop.That brings me to California, and more specifically the Napa Valley, the sweet spot for Merlot in America. While Cabernet Sauvignon is king in the Napa Valley, there is no doubt Merlot is part of the royal family.Napa Valley Merlot is like no other California Merlot, and the best compare favorably with top wines from Pomerol and Saint-Emilion.OK, so that’s just my opinion. Recent tastings, however, have only strengthened my belief that Napa Valley Merlot is some of the finest red wine in the world.Example No. 1: The 2000 St. Supery Napa Valley Merlot, which probably retailed for less than $25 when it was released sometime in 2002. Of the older Merlot I’ve tasted over the past couple of weeks, this was the best. While there was ample primary fruit in evidence, secondary aromas of coffee, black tea and cedar were beginning to emerge. The core fruit was sweet and supple, with silky tannins and a long, perfumed finish. Example No. 2: I shouldn’t have been surprised, but the 2003 Swanson Napa Valley Merlot was a stunner, which I wasn’t really expecting. Swanson had a major focus on Merlot when the winery opened a couple of decades ago with aspirations to compete with Duckhorn and other top Napa Valley Merlot producers. This Merlot from a vintage The Wine Spectator found wanting exhibited bold, lush, ripe fruit with firm tannins, and it’s my bet it has another five to seven years before reaching its peak. It probably cost around $40 upon release.Example No. 3: My greatest surprise was the 2001 St. Clement Napa Valley Merlot, which, if memory serves, I found a bit too oaky and underwhelming when it was released. The strong aroma of wood from its youth has been tamed, allowing the sweet aromas of black cherry and plum to shine. The tannins have rounded out, too. This seriously good Merlot was probably priced between $25 and $30 when it was released in 2003.Example No. 4: Despite its age, the Niebaum-Coppola 1999 Napa Valley Merlot had the most heft of the older Merlots tasted over these past two weeks. It remains ripe, robust and powerful, a delicious tasting experience and a good wine overall despite lacking the elegance of the other three. Stylistically this isn’t my favorite, but others might go gaga over the opulence. I’m guessing the price was about $35 when it came on the market.My takeaway from all this is that Merlot continues to be one of the best values in red wine from the Napa Valley. Generally speaking, Cabernet Sauvignon from Napa is considerably more expensive than Merlot. There are exceptions, such as Duckhorn and the Beringer Howell Mountain, that can rival Napa Cabs in price, but most of the time Merlot from Napa will provide the biggest bang for the buck.The following are ten of my favorite Napa Valley Merlots, based on tastings over the past 20 years:1. Duckhorn has been at the top of the heap for quite some time.2. Beringer Howell Mountain was a benchmark Napa Merlot from the first moment then-winemaker Ed Sbragia laid eyes on the vineyard.3. Chappellet is revered for its long-lived Cabernet Sauvignons, but for my money the Merlots have been just as good.4. Clos du Val Merlot is the essence of elegance.5. Shafer, like Chappellet, is known for its Cabernet, but its Merlot is always first-rate.6. Nickel & Nickel has two Merlots I absolutely love, the Suscol Ranch and the Harris Vineyard. You can’t go wrong with either one.7. Twomey is perhaps the most atypical for the Napa Valley, with Bordeaux sensibilities, meaning a firmer structure and less opulent fruit.8. St. Supery has always been strong on Merlot, and obviously it cellars exceedingly well.9. Swanson made its mark with Merlot under the guidance of the splendid winemaker Marco Cappelli, who has since moved on. Swanson Merlot is still very, very good.10. Silverado Vineyards is known for many things – Chardonnay, Cabernet and Sauvignon Blanc come readily to mind – but its Merlot has always been its ace in the hole. Click here for more of Robert Whitley's Wine Talk columns at Creators.com. Follow Robert on Twitter at @wineguru . |
|
|